{"id":20318,"date":"2020-10-15T17:08:12","date_gmt":"2020-10-15T17:08:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.shows4.com\/mobile\/?p=20318"},"modified":"2021-03-02T04:52:52","modified_gmt":"2021-03-02T04:52:52","slug":"scam-1992-the-harshad-mehta-story-review-bulls-on-parade","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.shows4.com\/?p=20318","title":{"rendered":"‘Scam 1992: The Harshad Mehta Story’ review: Bulls on parade"},"content":{"rendered":"
In the bull market that is Indian streaming TV, Scam 1992 arrives to scratch a specific itch: a show with a journalistic bent. The gold standard is David Simon\u2019s expansive productions, not just The Wire but also Show Me A Hero and The Deuce. These shows vary tonally and in subject matter, but their basic impulse is towards longform storytelling. The same can be said for Hansal Mehta\u2019s series (streaming on SonyLIV), which tracks the rise and fall of Harshad Mehta, for a while India\u2019s most famous stockbroker, then its most notorious scamster.
\nWhen Harshad (Pratik Gandhi) first steps onto the floor of the Bombay Stock Exchange, he\u2019s frozen in delight, even though everyone around him is frantically buying and selling. He\u2019s found a home\u2014and yet, his place isn\u2019t among the shouters. He wants to be the one who makes them shout. Because he has no wealthy backers, he establishes contacts in trade unions to keep track of management decisions, and uses that to bet on stocks (in Oliver Stone\u2019s Wall Street, still the best film in this genre, Bud Fox also got a leg up by providing insider information). Soon, Harshad is on the rise, calling the shots in the stock market, then in the money market. But his instinct is always to game the system, and eventually the system turns on him.
\nScam 1992 is linear, detailed and dogged. It isn\u2019t shy about peppering its conversations with finance talk and market jargon, but co-directors Hansal Mehta and Jai Mehta and writers Sumit Purohit, Saurav Dey, Vaibhav Vishal and Karan Vyas find inventive ways to dress up the exposition. I was encouraged by a detail in the show’s first scene. A nervous whistleblower (Sharib Hashmi) arrives at the Mumbai Times of India office looking for an editor. The first person he comes across, under a large cutout of the Common Man, is cartoonist R.K. Laxman (happily, the show uses actual names, from Reserve Bank of India governor S. Venkitaramanan to prime minister P.V. Narasimha Rao). They have a short exchange and Laxman deposits him in the editor\u2019s office.
\nThere were any number of ways that man could have ended up in the office but I can\u2019t think of a neater solution than this. Similarly, a scene with three of Mehta\u2019s detractors discussing the market takes place in a dance bar, not unlike Sean Parker in The Social Network yelling over the noise of a club to Mark Zuckerberg. Other scenes are constructed around cricket and golf games, over dessert in a restaurant. It\u2019s not quite The Big Short subbing in Anthony Bourdain and Margot Robbie to explain financial impropriety, but it\u2019s definitely a dose of sugar where none would have been fatal.
\nThe ordering and drinking of tea is a recurring motif. Harshad first talks of insider trading over chai outside the stock exchange. Later, when he wants to show how financially sound he is, he gives instructions to all the local tea-shops to bill him for his fellow brokers\u2019 expenses. In the State Bank of India office, as the ’92 scam threatens to break (he\u2019s taken \u20b9500 crore of their money), he’s offered tea by the office boy without the boss saying anything\u2014testament to his stature. He pronounces the tea bitter; later, when he returns their money, he says it’s sweet. Tea also figures prominently in the meetings of Sucheta Dalal (Shreya Dhanwanthary), the reporter who breaks the story, with her sources.\n<\/div>\n
\"\"<\/a><\/div>\n
\n
Related Videos<\/strong><\/div>\n